A review of the branch map, door markers and residents’ route corrections finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the West Entry map board. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: one side passage is labeled from its entrance but not from the return branch.
The the branch map, door markers and residents’ route corrections lists 74 junctions with a confirmed name and a direction mark; the previous window lists 73. Rook Moss checked both against household copies and route logs checked against the public board. The source was checked against a second copy held by Tikka Reed. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
The map office counts labeled entrances. Residents ask that every branch show how to return to the same junction. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide whether a resident can retrace the route after passing through an unmarked junction.
Afield walk checks the route from entry point to final branch. The Year first, vent change window 2 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The map crew will test the return path from both sides of each junction.
