A review of drain cards, wall moisture marks and repair tickets finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the east condensation channel. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: the lower joint drains only after the upper branch clears.
The drain cards, wall moisture marks and repair tickets lists 93 sections with a dry wall mark after a full cycle; the previous window lists 89. Niri Flint checked both against paired readings from the source and the last occupied branch. The source was checked against a second copy held by Tikka Reed. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
Repair crews use the upper drain card. Households ask for a mark from the lower joint that stayed wet. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how residents can tell whether a wet wall comes from a blocked drain or a delayed release.
Alimited route trial starts with a dated sign at each affected junction. The Year second, deep rest window 1 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The next inspection will note both upper release and lower wall condition.
