A decision on the flood gate branch markers should be judged at the low branch gates beneath Moss Row, where the rule changes an ordinary route, shift or service. Trace each route from its entrance marker to the last branch that residents rely on. The current file is the Year third, first seep window 3 review, not a permanent settlement of every future case.
The gate cards and the water crew’s route diagram lists 77 gates with a marker visible from the dry side; the previous window lists 76. Rook Moss checked both against household copies and route logs checked against the public board. The difference matters because whether a gate can be identified before a crew enters a wet branch.
The water crew can see the marker while operating the wheel. Residents need to identify the gate from the dry passage. Those objections deserve a clear answer. They are not a reason to keep an uncheckable rule simply because its wording is familiar.
A useful decision names who will do the work, which count will change and when the result comes back to the public table. In this case, one gate marker is placed behind the turn wheel.
The Year third, first seep window 3 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The inspector will test marker visibility from the dry approach and wheel station.
