A review of spoken route notes, carved markers and the public branch map finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the route table at Lantern Hall. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: one route name describes the sound heard at a junction rather than its shape.
The spoken route notes, carved markers and the public branch map lists 34 spoken names linked to a direction and junction; the previous window lists 36. Tikka Reed checked both against walk-through notes from every branch paired with the posted passage map. The source was checked against a second copy held by Tikka Reed. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
The map room wants direction names. Residents use sound names to remember the route. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how a map can hold a spoken name without mistaking it for a physical direction.
The table records the result and the branches included in the decision. The board recorded the outcome that it closed the file after both approaches matched the public map.
