A review of checkout tabs, repair tickets and workshop contribution marks finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the common tool chest at Slate Bend. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: the same hand drill moves between three workbenches in one shift.
The checkout tabs, repair tickets and workshop contribution marks lists 63 tools returned with a signed handoff and repair note; the previous window lists 57. Rook Moss checked both against household copies and route logs checked against the public board. The source was checked against a second copy held by Kip Copper. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
The chest charges the last borrower. Workshops say the handoff tabs show a shared use. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how a repair cost is shared when a tool passes through several hands.
Anew route file opens with an entrance, branch and service named. The Year first, first seep window 1 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The chest will trial a split handoff mark on frequently shared tools.
