A review of scale stamps, buyer slips and the common measure board finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the scale pocket at Moss Market. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: a reference weight was moved from the lower pocket during a floor repair.
The scale stamps, buyer slips and the common measure board lists 25 loads with a second check from a public reference weight; the previous window lists 27. Kip Copper checked both against check-out slips compared with the handoff mark at the next station. The source was checked against a second copy held by Kip Copper. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
The repair crew says the weight is secure in storage. Buyers ask for a replacement reference before trading resumes. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how a buyer can compare a load when the shared reference is temporarily elsewhere.
The map crew posts an updated card while keeping the earlier copy linked. The responsible office has begun the follow-up set by the board, which sent a separate sign question to a new route review without reopening this one.
